In the latter part of the debate, 6 questions were raised, which allegedly were members of the population. I doubt this because it may have been somewhat prepared beforehand by the organizers of the event. No questions were wrong, but I still doubt that it was as they say.
The candidate Humala took the opportunity to launch an hcg diet attack on his opponent in the response of the questions, the reference did not have anything to do with the answer to the 100 day loans question, but he launched the attack anyway, and said:
- “… We believe in dialogue. So it’s strange when Fujimori congressman, said that she believes in dialogue. Because, as I recall, there was no dialogue in the Baguaso. And was just her, her initiative, not to repeal the emergency decrees, suspended. And that was the trigger that today mourned the Peruvian family … ”
Keiko, was forced to clarify this at the beginning of one of the answers to the questions of “the people” and he said Lt. Col. Ollanta Humala discharged:
- “First let me clarify that I have no responsibility in the areas of Bagua, contrary to what I’ve always wanted is to find the solution to that problem. (Looking at it he Life Insurance Quotes said:) So stop lying Humala commander … ”
I honestly do not see Ollanta Humala as a political leader. My opinion is someone rather than managed by a group that wants to settle in the state’s power. I think and I believe that this power comes directly from Venezuela. Their expressions in the debate, I saw very weak solvency and dynamism. Mistakes, to stumble, not say the words, gestures and glances have insecurity was what I noticed in their interventions. That’s why for me, his final statement was not relevant. Very different from the intervention of the candidate Keiko Fujimori, if demonstrated fluency in speech, security and firm in their views. That’s why to transcribe verbatim. Keiko Fujimori, concluded:
- “I want to start” Plastic Bins also “wishing luck to my opponent this coming June 5 (at any time I wish you luck Humala Keiko). I came to this second round, with the vote of a quarter of Peruvians. Today, many who did not vote for ‘Force 2011′, have decided to support us. Today many people are putting their trust in me, and I say that I will not disappoint. I especially thank Peter Paul K., Lucho Losio Castañeda, Humberto Lay Pastor, Maximo San Roman. All of these political leaders who have passed the first round, have thought of it first in Peru. The generosity shown by many people in this campaign is proof of the spiritual greatness of the Peruvians. So I say that one of the greatest treasures of our country is its people. People who have had to face great problems, such as terrorism, such as hyperinflation, and natural disasters. Today we have over 20 years of unprecedented economic growth. And denver accident lawyer we have the opportunity to continue. The great problems of today, include closing two gaps: The economic gap, which excludes 
especially the poorest Peruvians, and the social gap caused by the internal war. That is why throughout this campaign, I wanted to show that we can recognize our mistakes and ask for an apology necessary. The proposal to ‘Force 2011′ my personal commitment is to seek and offer Peruvians, close the economic gap of poverty and social gaps generated. I address this message, especially to people who think like us, who do not agree with our proposed policy. I want to say to all Peruvians, rich and poor, believers or not, right or left, that my government is characterized by seeking consensus and agreements in the framework of the Constitution and the law. I will work especially needy Peruvians. To defend national sovereignty and internal order. (Looking to Humala) and not allow course foreign encroachments. Personally, errors of others, I have carried a very large cross. I am a mother, and never allow that my daughters (names mentioned) have to live what I lived. So look to the future, learning from the past. Together undertake the challenge of building a fairer Peru, with more inclusion, respect for those who think like us, seeking our commonalities. This is the kind of government that I Keiko Fujimori, I want for my country. I will work to achieve a safe Peru and opportunities for Peruvians living abroad to return soon. May God enlighten all families, this June 5, that accompany and guide our steps. (After making gestures of deaf said) I’m going to work together with, all of you. Thank you very much “-.
After this message, the audience was in the Hotel, loose applause, and then the moderator stopped, saying he was banned all demonstrations throughout the debate. Well, is that the message was worthy of applause.
Something that struck me in particular was when he said that Peru wants to make something bigger than it already is, for all our compatriots who were, for a better life (financially speaking) to return to our country and feel here, it’s better than abroad (economically speaking). Hopefully then, we know to choose and as she said: “May God enlighten us.”
Follow the debate and try to hit this time the theme “Economy and Social Inclusion.” The first intervention was in charge of Keiko Fujimori said:
- “Trust and credibility allow Peruvians continue investing for growth, create more jobs, and thus combat poverty. Our campaign has been characterized by having a single government plan. A single speech and say things clear. And what is clear is that the social market economy in the Constitution of 1993, creates competitiveness, attracting investment, has allowed us to grow at an annual average of 5% in the last 17 years. Why, then, change the Constitution? Why do you want to review the Free Trade? What plans Humala government will use the commander? These ups and downs as they generate a lot of instability and doubt. What we do is to strengthen the economic model, with a policy that includes the poor in growth. We need a set of reforms to which communities, our small and medium businesses, participate in markets that are opening up. As producers of organic bananas from Piura, as the case Paucartambo quinoa in Cusco, which is being exported to Australia and Germany. Today we have many more resources, we have to do is change the functioning of the Ministry of Economy and 
Finance. Which was established to administer the few resources we had at the time. Today the Ministry of Economy, has to be a promoter and facilitator of investments. To achieve that Peru also more competitive, we need to reduce logistics costs, which are more than 30%. And that will promote investment in infrastructure, more roads, with roads, ports and airports. Connect to Peru. We will give special emphasis on youth employment. That’s why we launched the “My first chamber” where 200.000 give scholarships to young people between 16 and 24, to be trained and studied in the best technical institutes, as Senati, or Tecsup Sensico. Besides and most importantly, they are guaranteed their first job. And as important as ensuring economic growth, is to ensure that labor laws are enforced. That’s why we launched the Superintendency of labor rights, which will hire inspectors to 5,000, to ensure that we respect your 8 hours of work, get paid your overtime pay you your benefits. Eliminate abuse of the Services. A growing economy with a social, ensure opportunities for all Peruvians “-
It should be noted – and not because he goes, I vote for Keiko – is that all this is said without stumble or make mistakes in expressions. Which is not to the commander Humala.
In the next segment, he played Humala ask about the subject for a minute the candidate Keiko, and the first thing he said was that the producers of organic bananas from Piura, have made the German market, not state aid, but alone. Is it possible to export back to the government? Keiko then told that she proposes labor flexibility, and said: – “This means: reducing holiday, overtime, holidays, Sunday. This involves not just personal consolidate services, among other forms of precarious work. The flexibility makes labor costs, just pay the worker, and that competitiveness is based precisely on lower wages. I ask: Why do you want to delete the holiday for workers? And why are you defending this flexibility, it does not help the worker to have better wages, have job security, job security peace in families? “-
Humala tried at all times to confuse the public about the proposals of his opponent. Keiko said:
- “We have never talked about the elimination of the holiday, the benefits of workers. Rather, we seek to ensure respect for the rights of all workers, so we create this “Superintendent of Labor Rights” When it comes to flexibility, we are looking for the paperwork, the procedures are much faster. It takes many weeks to achieve in our country to be formal. And that is really what we’re after. Major Humala not confuse you people! “-.
Humala then touched him expound on the subject. Among other things said: – “… No community consultation when dealers their territories …” – Excuse me? Is not that the national territory belongs to all Peruvians? Humala gave figures that I would have to be verified. He said that ultimately the government of Alberto Fujimori – who incidentally, was not who I was debating – 23.000 led to the bankruptcy of companies in Peru, and the ruin of 1’000, 000 farmers. It would be nice to verify this information, because honestly no longer believe anything this man. Humala returned to confuse public opinion, saying the Camisea natural gas, liquefied gas is equal to that consumed in our homes. Humala did not say no at any time after each intervention, the catchphrase: “You have my word” seem to know that no one believes him.
Then it was to ask Keiko:
- “If I win you some major Humala is that it has many more plans of government that I, and obviously generates more fear. To keep our economy growing we need to build trust. And confidence means having a single speech. In its initial government plan, you propose to change the car loans constitution 17 times or so. But then in their commitment to Peru in its road map, and since then his oath says no. I wonder if you going to keep the 1993 Constitution, or not? “-
This was the big question is not answered discharged Lt. Col. Ollanta Humala. His response was beat around the bush and attack your opponent taking out the government of Alberto Fujimori. It seems that the candidate did not understand when Keiko was told that it was discussing with her and not Alberto Fujimori.
(Written in June 2006) I asked a friend who contribute to the drafting of technical documentation to attach to the supply that opts to tender for consultancy services in business process reengineering, a municipal corporation. While I have receiver promoter and procurement of civil works and I know paintball gear all the protocol, I’ve never worked on composing, presenting and qualify for a bid, so I appreciate the opportunity to participate in this work.
However, in view of slow reading of the specifications and the required calls to those contacts in my networking who can advise, I have emerged a balanced uncertainty about the process, generating a feeling of helplessness and sadness.
I want to be optimistic by nature, so I avoid the word “impossible” and I tell my friend who is going to be “very difficult”. Technically I think we grow in size with issues of process reengineering and continuous improvement. We have a team of collaborators / as who have experience in this type of work.
Also, professional communities in which we participate are going to nurture those other profiles that are necessary to move forward with this type of project. Moreover, the company will tender has extensive experience working with local management consulting services. Finally, as I have no grandmother, I will say that since 1998 I have struggled directly and indirectly with this type of business objectives and I feel very comfortable with these challenges.
However, I read and read the technical contract documents – administrative and I feel as if the document sent me a message comic-tragic, but I do not have paranormal powers, so we are left without cracking it. In short, they are feelings that are difficult to explain but I’ll try to be moving some of these shivering.
You see, I analyze the language and I think that either you have a wrongheaded idea of what this type of job analysis procedures or a tailored suit for a specific consultant and preconceived profile, very very very specialized and deep vertical in the field of reengineering and, while in the field of company-specific activity in question. I ask again: what is or what is the process reengineering?
On the other hand, as if to ask what to do and how they are going to do (and even the results to be obtained). No, look, I’ll tell you what to do but how is my “expertise”, my competitive edge and not want to go there.
It defines the profile of the team, agreed, but said in a silhouette diabetic foot care that professional expatriates, which is what confuses best led tv me greatly. Later, he elaborates on the objective criteria will be assessed a high percentage of the total score of experience in the CrossFit Denver specific sector. Frankly, these pickets are excessive and completely absolutist, if not exclusive.
There are other aspects of the bid that I generate more than reasonable doubt about the goodness in designing professional project, but I will not make a long insert to this article. Will review my thoughts about the process reengineering, continuous improvement, financial reengineering, and so on. will not be significantly outdated find me.
In short, I will work on the drafting of the offer, propose that says “what is” what will be done and be excessively truant to say “how.” To you be moving the outcome of the tender and if granted to us or if you grant us and why, at least to learn all of this experience.
Tuesday September 20 this year (2011) Jaime de Althaus in his program “Time N” talked about the response of Ollanta Humala denied the journalist Jorge Ramos of Univision, and this was what he said:
- “President Humala refused to answer if you seek reelection. This was in an interview with the driver of Univision, Jorge Ramos. We extract:
Jorge Ramos: – “Ollanta Humala in New York, gave an interview with Univision. Is participating in the Assembly of United Nations Organization. Today I spoke with him about various topics and finally asked him if he ruled out completely the possibility of reelection, but the president refused to answer Humala. This is part of the interview:
Humala: – “To me, I chose the Peruvian people for five years and also I believe Presidents deserve respect. So I think that this type of questions, I get the impression that you had a prejudice against me, which I can not accept “-
Ramos: – “No, no, no, I just want to know if do you seek re-election in any way?” -
Humala: – “Have you heard my speeches? Why you ask? “-
Ramos: – “I’ve heard several of them. I just want to know if you do you are looking for or seek re-election?, That’s all “-
Humala: – “What I’m looking for is precisely what we have offered to meet the Peruvian people” -
Ramos: – “So, but what you financial assistance seek re-election? So Does absolutely rule the possibility that he will seek reelection in the future? “-
Humala: – “Look, I repeat it. I think that if you have heard my speeches, has the answer and “-
On the theme “Security and Traffic Narco” Keiko Fujimori said:
- “… It is unacceptable that, for example, motorcycle taxi drivers in Chicago, or families living in settlements high Trujillo, quotas have to pay to protect your property. In my government defeat crime … “” … we will create the crime observatory that allows us to analyze and identify areas where more crime occurs, and thus better redistribution of our police forces … “” … I will never allow terrorists to be called belligerents, Humala commander incomprehensibly as you call them … ”
Keiko mentioned in relation to drug trafficking control of chemical inputs for the production of drugs, and control of active washes. He spoke of building more roads that allows farmers get their products to connect with the market. On this subject I think Keiko, has collected Losio Castañeda proposal, suggesting the construction of the road to the Andes.
Then Humala was accused of crimes of corruption committed during Alberto Fujimori’s government, to which Keiko replied:
- “I was faced with Vladimiro Montesinos to help a family that was being pursued. I took this decision, at the suggestion of Bishop Bambaren Monsignor Cipriani, and highly regarded attorney, Dr. Ugaz. I was faced with Vladimiro Montesinos. You however, did Locumba lifting, according to statements of Mr. Montesinos own in 2006, to cover his escape. So let’s talk things clear, commander Humala. Here we know who fought and who covered up Mr. Montesinos “-
Keiko then asks Humala:
- “Major Humala, you have belonged to the Peruvian army, and on page 45 of its plan of government literally says,” is incorporated by express provision, military justice in the civil courts. ” I ask: How do they feel the members of the armed forces and national police against this proposal, which seeks the disappearance of military justice? “-
Humala responds by saying that according to the Constitution, there is only an independent judiciary, and there can be two judiciaries. This is a clear attempt to confuse people because the Constitution is one thing, the military courts is another.
Then aborted the theme ‘Democratic Institutions’ and the candidate Ollanta Humala said they had proposed’ Corruption and Human Rights’ and representatives’ Force virility ex 2011 “decided to put that name to the block. I did not understand the Denver Divorce Attorney reason for not addressing these issues, was to prevent attacks from both sides. But he did what he felt like in the debate and passed by attacking his opponent, without specific and concrete proposals.
Keiko question in turn, makes the following Ollanta Humala:
- “With reference to democratic Institutions, page 45 of his government plan, you establish an independent check on the judiciary. This proposal would then play out of the institutional bodies of the judiciary, as Ogma, and the National Judicial Council. Could you explain a little what this proposal? “-
Humala told this has already spoken with the judiciary and says that we must solve the problem of who to moralize moralizing …?
This part is coming, I think is the main discussion to consider. I say to those who are still undecided who to choose. Ollanta Humala Keiko asks:
- “… When you send your ads, are the photos of you and your father. So you are telling the voters, “vote for two” but it turns out one of the two is in prison for corruption, and human rights violators. I wonder: Will you return that mountain of money, which robbed the people of Peru? “-
Keiko replied:
- “… I want to clarify also that I am the candidate. No Alberto Fujimori. You if you want to debate with me, because confront my ideas. If you want to discuss with Alberto Fujimori, as it can go if you want to Diroes. I’m the one who makes the decisions in my party, I called the technical team, which has called on candidates and congressmen who are now elected. And if I am elected President of Peru, not I, who make the decisions “-
We are just 6 days to elect our new President of the Republic and we have had the final presidential debate, with the two candidates for this request. To review and comment on this event – it’s a little long – I have to split it into two or three articles, in order to not be as tedious to read.
At this point, and all media are biased to their candidate of choice. My opinion is also biased. Two years I will be writing about politics and I can state with absolute certainty (because of my pastoral theological training) a “Christian Democratic neoliberals.” So from this perspective, I begin to analyze, comment and opinion from my point of view, the Presidential Debate.
As a data file, say that the Presidential Debate took place on Sunday May 29, 2011, at 8:45 pm at the Marriott Hotel Miraflores district of Lima. It was organized by: The National Jury of Elections, Transparency Civil Association, the Consortium for Economic and Social Research and the National Democratic Institute in the framework of the “informed vote.”
The presidential candidates were: Kiko Fujimori and Ollanta Humala. The moderator of the debate was: Jose Maria Salcedo and the four topics to be discussed were: 1 .- The fight against poverty; 2 .- Security and narco-trafficking; 3 .- Democratic Institutions; 4 .- Economic and Social Inclusion. The debate lasted an hour and a half and was developed as follows:
Ollanta Humala first speech on “Attacking Poverty”:
Ollanta Humala said he has traveled and lived throughout Peru …? (By the way what I have discussed all image and audio recorded to verify such a claim) but follow. He said it was giving away things that could win votes. He said the economic growth which we live is a growth that does not reach everyone. And he mentioned something that all candidates who passed through this election agree: ‘Economic growth with social inclusion’.
Ollanta reaffirmed its intention to launch the program ‘Pension 65′ in which 250 new soles give all seniors who worked all his life and had no opportunity to contribute. Eye “to all”, did not speak to focus. He said that this program will be funded entirely from the public treasury How long shall this be? How runs the Treasury? He also said that corruption has 10,000 million dollars of the Peruvian State, but did not say what time is that this event occurs, or on which to affirm this statistic. He said it was more than one third of the general budget of the Republic.
At all times remember that Keiko was first lady in the government of Alberto Fujimori. He said that this president embezzled $ 600 million and that money could have easily used to fund ‘board 65′ for 5 years and have benefited 120.000 Peruvians. Mr. Humala Does he know the difference between embezzling state funds and steal them? I have understood that embezzlement is when a line item for a government program, you take that money to another sector of the state. And that’s not stealing the money, but make a bad administration.
Ollanta promised and promised many generalities, but said where would the money to fund all these promises. He criticized his opponent’s proposal on “flexible working”.
Keiko Fujimori’s first intervention, with a question to his opponent:
Keiko said: – “Major Humala, the best way of fighting poverty, creating jobs, is to generate growth. And something that has allowed our economy to grow, no doubt, is the opening of markets. Has been achieved thanks to the signing of free trade. In his initial plan you propose the review of all free trade agreements, then said, no longer. I wonder what is your real position? “-
Humala says,
- “Whenever we talk about social inclusion policies, they always say where will the money? And that we believe is a mistaken view, because we believe that economic growth must reach all “-
With the respect they deserve all Humala’s supporters, I think the commander Humala lacks property to speak. There is “always say” but “always ask” and not “silver”, but “money.” Then invalidate the question because she e-cigarette says it is a wrong view. It seems you do not like being asked where to get the money to fund all proposals. Then he said, among Bankruptcy other things:
- “… Defend the national market, but above all, the domestic industry. And renegotiation is not undemocratic, dialogue means two and a dialog not “-
It is clear the intention of Mr. Humala to annoy all free trade agreements which are leading to sustained economic growth.
Intervention Keiko Fujimori Keiko greeted in Spanish and Quechua – good point – and said:
- “In our country there are 10 million Peruvians living in poverty. 3 million of these live in extreme martial arts denver poverty. These figures are calculated based on income. However, the money they earn is not the only way to calculate poverty. Those who do not have potable water, are also considered poor, those who do not have electricity, or have no access to health services, or that a million children still go hungry. Today we fear many more resources, we have to do is convert these estimates we see, in work and quality services to all citizens. I do not believe in trickle-down policy implemented by Mr. Toledo. So I catches the intention that you commander Humala, who criticized both the policy and who used it as pretext for a coup attempt, to call those same technicians today to become part of your team. Force 2011 is a government plan, one plan of government … “-
An interesting proposal on education was when he said: – “… we must also improve the content. For that work better textbooks adapted to the reality, and customs of each region …”-
Keiko spoke about the proposal to launch the bond of family protection, food security bond, which is seeking 125 new soles per month to families in extreme poverty. In this proposal, if it is consistent in the targeting of aid and is more reasonable in their implementation. Then literally to the letter continued:
- “We will promote also the title of property, giving it water and sewer to all families in Peru. Hence the significant presence of economist Hernando de Soto to ensure the success of this program … “-
A Humala ask touched on these proposals and said that the government of Alberto Fujimori his father, where she was first lady – (in the whole debate he reiterated this statement) – sterilizations were carried out more than 300,000 poor women without their consent. And she said she was 26 and it was not a girl. I acknowledge Dr. Aguinaga to perform these sterilizations. And he said the idea was to eliminate poverty had to eliminate the poor. And he asked him why he did nothing?
I do not understand Mr. Humala, is that the main idea of family planning program in the government of Alberto Fujimori, was targeting aid tubal ligation, mothers living in extreme poverty, which already had 4 or 5 children. And if we talk about numbers, we must be precise because to auto insurance quotes say “more than 300.00″ can be 1’000, 000 or more.
But what else has happened to President Ollanta Humala? Frankly concerned that refusal to answer whether it’s going to go, or will not go for re-election. If he has clear ideas about it, that will not go perfectly, it has to respond just as simple as “I’m not going to re-election.” But this hypersensitivity to one simple question, as legitimate, as indeed mentioned the journalist, then, is reflecting an intention or close to go for re-election, so that the question has touched a weak spot, or are expressing I do not know, a sort of authoritarian hubris. “I do not answer” no “I do not want to give the victory of a response from me.” One hand there’s a certain pride, and on the other hand, an authoritarian attitude, where I decide what questions you can ask me and what not. It can not be then. You have to learn the president to serve in a more democratic, and above all please, we can not return again to the uncertainty of whether he is seeking re-election or not. Of course, it is said that he would seek re-election by his wife Nadine Heredia, who by the way, accompanied him to New York. President Nadine Heredia travels everywhere … “-
My opinion, which is very tempting to power. And stay with it, it is also tempting. Fujimori and show it. Signals can be very clear. “I follow the economic model, but no one removed from power.” Only would fail to accommodate the entire intelligence apparatus so that no one takes away their power. Fujimori did it very well. All woven a web of corrupt officials who protected him until he could no longer be more and the bomb exploded. I wish our president think of your family, especially his daughters especially. To not have to suffer what is hurting right now Keiko Fujimori. And do not be tempted by this great power to dominate everything and everyone. Eye combating drug trafficking is back – as Fernando Rospigliosi said – “It appears the state is paying to this threat,” Do not go unless there is also pressure on that side, and the temptation is greater still. Care.
This Friday ‘Peru Possible’ decide who will be members of a team – they say – keep the executive branch. Toledo called this group “shadow cabinet” The charge to stand up for this was the party leader Luis Thais. And in an interview with the news ‘First at eight’ said:
- “This system exists primarily in Britain, but there are all in the Congress. In this case, some members of Congress who will be involved, no doubt, but we are not the majority in Congress … ”
This reminds me a little time of Fujimori. When given the coup, he immediately formed a group “shadow” also under the command of San Roman, made a sort of “parallel government” to Fujimori.
The Constitutional Committee of Congress approved the Bill applicability for crimes of corruption among public officials. This includes disqualification of officials who are guilty of this crime, for life. Congressman Javier Bedoya de Vivanco said:
- “… This then will lead the public official, or will not lift a finger, will not want to commit not to sign anything, and the state is going to be more inefficient mammoth of wow gold what today is …” -
Luz Salgado for his part said:
- “… Here, and forward view – referring to the chairman of the committee – because he wanted to take this standard and we were putting the congressmen who are asking for further study” against the wall. ” I wanted to remove it anyway and now has taken … “-
The chairman of the Judiciary Cesar San Martin, also spoke and stated the following:
- “… Not all serious misconduct must be of limitations, only those that are particularly relevant level. And that I understand to be a function of the ordinary legislator, go carefully determining what those behaviors dire … “- But we still need to be debated in the House of Congress.
I do not know if the Lord is naive Abugattas, but says there are many professionals who have their degrees abroad and can not be hired in Congress because his title was not worth it. Abugattas Lord, you do not know that these titles will also be forged in Azangaro. Who will check overseas if they were issued for real? Oh is that it is doing so knowingly, to benefit the cronies – as someone said?
Is hilarious to listen to Congressman Rolando Reátigui of the bench ‘strength 2011′ when defending Congressman Valqui Nestor of the same bench, saying:
- “… He has served a sentence, he has rehabilitated completely, as any citizen who commits a mistake in life, you have the opportunity to rehabilitate. And he erases all criminal records when more than fulfilled the sentence … “-
But: That’s the concept they have to evaluate people who are representatives in Congress in his political movement? Nobody says that criminals can not be rehabilitated, but from there, to be congressmen. Please.
More share Toledo’s government for this government – as was the promise of Ollanta toward Toledo -. The new CEO of “Sierra Exportadora” is none other than Alfonso Velásquez, who was Minister of Production in the era of Toledo. The other promises are fulfilled.
t happened over a week and still not know who will chair the megacomición to investigate the previous government. It is not known how many congressmen will join the commission – 7 or 12 – or who will. If it delays the start for a lot, just imagine how long the end of it. And for what?: That in the end, everything is nothing.
At the moment there are three issues involved in shady lawmakers in Congress. Congressman ‘Wins Peru’ Amado Romero, and they named him “eat gold,” for having links to informal mining. Then there is Congressman ‘Force 2011′ Ccama Francisco, being a member of the company “Puno Gold,” which would throw mercury, arsenic and copper in the river Ramis. And finally (for now) Congressman Valqui Nestor also ‘Force 2011′ which has a store in Pasco, where he would practice sexual exploitation.
But this was already known in advance. So: people choose them the same? What did the Minister of Culture (but beware that the case is different). The Prime Minister who appointed her, I knew that the lady had contracts outstanding artistic. What’s more, not yet presented his plan of government in Congress, and it will be two months in office. How do you appoint someone who is known in advance, you can not do their job?
To make matters worse, it turns out to work in Congress on the administrative side, you no longer need to meet many requirements. Almost anyone can work in that place. If you have the reputation of the Congress (not all of course) leaves much to be desired, now add the entire administrative apparatus, which is going to finish decorating. Some say this is to benefit the friends of this government, which helped to make this come to power.
Beware of offers. Housing Minister Rene Cornejo, said he will build a new city in Pisco by the end of 2013. If this is true, in good time, but be wary of promises given time, because I have seen cases, which is promised and not fulfilled. We hope that this government makes a difference, of truth in this.
Jaime de Athaus in their program “Time N ‘said:
- “Kurt’s sister Burnet, Minister of Production, was promoted with twice the salary suddenly, after his brother was appointed minister. This in eHealth. The minister in his face book page has defended the decision. He said: “If Dr. Vidal – who is the CEO of eHealth – it’s considered for a position of trust Where is wrong?” Sure, there is no crime here is not it, simply that it is a great coincidentally, just as his brother is named minister, suddenly you get a consent deserves double pay “-
This is always going to happen in any government. This is what the press finds out, but how much more will be discovered? … I’m thinking and I wonder if there were no press? What would the thing? Do we learn of all these things?
My friend Dante makes a comment about my article “Ricardo Soberón” and says among other things the following:
- “Ha, ha, ha, my dear brother that one DUI Attorneys of the things I said is that” we must not blindly believe “all that shows in the media (which in truth are not” communication “because communication is dialogue, but dialogue with those who are not in the studio, but with us men on foot). For me, for example, no other journalist in this part of America, Cesar Hildebrant, but why not let the “grooming” anyway what he says and I have to admit that “written with the liver.” I remember when transcribing every day to the other James, until “I fell” because we are human, brother and … nobody’s perfect “-
To which I reply:
- “Dante friend, do not understand how is that the dialogue of journalists to ordinary people. I understand that I have the work of the journalist is to observe an event and inform the recipient – in this case to the ordinary citizen or the public in general – but in an objective and subjective: that is not to comment on the news but reporting period; to the receiver itself make judgments about the news according to their intellectual level. This makes for example Josephine Townsend, on the news “first eight” on channel ‘N’.
Another thing is – I think – an opinion journalism where the journalist thinks about the news. I think Jaime de Althaus makes a rigorous view of political affairs, invites people who specialize in the issues addressed and – modesty aside – is little understood among the common denominator of people who usually watch television. And this for me is teaching in politics – regardless of whether I agree or not, he analyzes.
I must say, I do like Cesar Hildebrant journalism, and I agree with you when you say you write with the liver, but is another form of journalism, which I think is not bad. As for Jaime Bayly is not that I’ve fallen, what happens is that I always agree on how to use the syntax and literary rhetoric in his writings, but did not agree with the crazy writing . I think I always said in my articles. Maybe when he spoke of presidential proposals – in its schizophrenic attempt to reach the presidency – the reason I gave him, but suddenly they were matters in which we all agreed, but he said with the high demagogic.
An arm and are in contact “-
On the other hand: With what research the government of Alan Garcia, what is being achieved, is to verify what he said: “If you put me firmly back in 2016.” These investigations can last four plus years that this government lacks Ollanta Humala. Why Congress is not engaged in what to do and not doing witch hunts? Not that Alan Garcia is defending, but I want to see effectiveness in Congress. And I think also that the same may be happening with Castaneda Lossio. Would you be doing to advance campaign and Alan García Castañeda Lossio?
Was there corruption in the government of Alan Garcia? Of course!, But Alan knows that if he had something serious acts of corruption that has to be careful, some time ago already had left the country. Corruption of the previous government – to put it in some way – were of low intensity compared with those of Alberto Fujimori. And that Alan has a process for the previous government (at the Fronton) Has it been tried? No. So do not waste time in paying congressmen to spend a little more than four years investigating Alan Garcia. And I’m not APRA eye and Alan; because they officially belong to the Christian People’s Party. What happens is that I am realistic.
The Plenary session of Congress in Ica, agreed to revise the process of rebuilding questioned Ica, for possible acts of corruption that prevented carrying out this reconstruction. It was also agreed the establishment of the Technological University of Chincha and investigate the Materials Bank. I would argue that these issues could be seen perfectly in Lima.
Lawsuits and discussions were not expected in this decentralized Congress – to vary -. The discussion was led by Congressmen Mauricio Javier Diez Canseco and Mulder. And all attitudes.
Puno, Cajamarca, Junin and Huancavelica, are the next stages for Decentralized Congress by President Daniel Abugattas. Yehude Simon, said this so that people will again believe in the Congress. Meanwhile, the people shouted and called out of the arena closed Joseph Oliva Razzeto of the city of Ica. Only college students entered the arena and left on the street many unions representing workers. Students leaving the campus, protesting that he could not hear what they said members of Congress, because there was so much echo. This is another issue that was not taken into account.
In regard to the University of Technology in Chincha, Congress delegated to the Executive agreed to develop a bill for this. If the Executive to look at this, he realizes that it is not viable or feasible this creation would be deceiving the people of Chincha. And as it is understood, the Minister of Education, disagrees with this. Does the government would have to switch to the Minister, to make way for this? How many more ministers would have to change? What will happen?
On the other hand, the Attorney General José Antonio Peláez Bardales, said there will be an amnesty for illegal use of weapons, and review all licenses to carry them. He did not say what will happen to all those who use guns illegally. I would argue that a search should be focused on all areas with high crime rates, and penalties and punishments would have to be drastic.
And finally, again there was unrest in Chile caused by students. Whenever I watch TV these riots see something peculiar in the images. Something that maybe others have observed: Amid all the maze of protesters throwing stones at police, police with water pouring Pinochitos, you can see a lot of stray dogs barking and jumping everywhere. Is there a lot of stray dogs in those areas of manifestation?
Speaking a bit of economic management in our country. Interestingly, the proposals of the Executive with respect to investment projects in both regional governments and local governments. This is nothing less than the “budget for results.” This means that every time you apply for or are given money to the regional or local governments, they must submit evaluations of previous projects to see what results gave them. I think it’s great that you have to evaluate these previous projects to measure the strengths and weaknesses in them.
In my ignorance, I did not understand that that mining earn more pay less tax and those earning less pay more taxes. But looking and reading a bit I realized that for example: a large mining company that has a 63% profit margin, pay 3% tax law. And just as a mining company girl who has a profit margin of 35%, pays 3% as imposed by law. This – thank God – the State has understood and is correcting the error. Good point.
On the other hand, the Congress President Daniel Abugattas, says: “then got stuck in Congress and nothing is done.” It’s full congressional trip to the city of Ica. But I do not know, is not about spending more or less, if not, well spent. So, in cases positive and beneficial to the country. Mr. Abugattas not do tantrums.
Congressman Mauricio Mulder, is wrong when he says that the comptroller is to blame for the crimes of corruption under the previous government. “He did a good job,” he said. He says that the public official, you can not control himself self. What good. It justified the acts of corruption under the previous government. But beware, if more than ten thousand corrupt officials in the previous government, it is very difficult in this government, this figure credit card offers falls to zero. Then it is up to the previous government but the previous the previous, this, and everyone.
First trip of one of the principal officers of the state. The Prime Minister will travel on personal business. No one knows where it goes, but said he will return on September 6. Provided that no leak, everything is fine. It was also said that this trip will not cost you a penny to the state.
It seems that we are already the first social conflict comes to this government. This is brewing in Moquegua, against the company Sauder. You heard the rioters in the streets that are demagogic, urging the people of low intellectual levels, against the company. How do you manage this from the executive? Is unknown. At any time there is a new or a new Aduviri Pizango in this area. Let’s see how applying its conflict prevention policy this government. Eye regional president of Moquegua is behind all this. We are requiring the company to make more infrastructure work in the area. A part of the whole tax burden you have and from which he comes. When I see these politicians – such as regional president of Moquegua – look and feel, in his words, a high demagogic and a tremendous desire to figuretismo.
It is contradictory to think that the State intends to form productive enterprises, for the State, rather, is the regulator of private productive enterprises in the country. Otherwise the State would become judge and jury. Much is said about Brazil’s economic model. But it is Brazil that you must follow our economic model and not follow the pattern Peru Brazil.
Pedro Perez – representative of the growers – says he does not agree with the violent and compulsory eradication of crops of coca leaf. He also says that the state has never cared for them, and so are forced to sell coca to drug dealers (in other words). And he says the state should give them the alternative crop to stop growing coca. Do you realize? In other words, if the State does not help me, I keep selling cocaine to drug trafficking. And they – the growers – do not put anything in their power to solve the problem. It is very difficult to ask a little common sense to the growers, is that common sense is the least common of the senses.
Jorge Velasquez, president of the Ucayali region, said the Central Government, does not accompany the growers. Ollanta eye and the thing begins.
The truth is not understood: Jorge Velasquez wants to alternative crops, but disagrees with the eradication of coca crops. But then, where it is grown in the alternative, if there are crops of coca leaf? Crazy ¿no? You have to eradicate, to plant something else.
To finish this article, the current Minister of Labor Rudecindo Vega, said that the meetings it had with the CGTP, and the shop floor, is appreciating a new discourse on their part. You are not so radical in their social order. He also indicated that it has formed the “National Council of Labour” to dialogue with the unions, MSEs, large employers and the state. He also expressed his intention to ideologize work. This is their main goal.
After listening to the interview last night on the program “The Hour” N “‘Jaime de Althaus, the current Minister of Labour Minister could appreciate a good job in his role quite loquacious on issues related to policy sector, and wish him the best of luck in their management.
The government of President Ollanta Humala, begins with a cabinet that brings together different personalities that do not have the same thought, and political ideologies.
To track this government analytical, I want to submit the names of all ministers of state that begin with this new government. Every time our president decides to switch to one of them, we must be vigilant in finding out what was the motive and circumstances under which it decides to change. Thus, in this way, we will see what are the true intentions Ollanta policies to our country.
I like many political analysts that major decisions will be centered between the Minister of Finance, the Prime Minister and President of the Republic. I also believe that to be defined immediately, what are the rules for new foreign investments in our country, in mining, because they are 43 billion dollars that are waiting to be invested in our country. Do you go Relevant Life Policy to another place, or do they stay?
The Minister that start with the new era Humala are:
Prime Minister: Lerner
Minister of Labour and Employment: Vega Rudecindo
Minister of Justice: Francisco Eguiguren
Minister of Interior:
Today, 29 of car insurance comparison July 2011, has left Mr. Ollanta Humala, 4 years and 364 days to be president. And this time I return as promised. Ensure from my small trench for Democracy in our country.
Ollanta Humala swore by the 1979 Constitution. The oath had to be on the Constitution. Ollanta is the idea that some parts of the present Constitution should be changed. This may be possible, but this is done according to law, according to the framework that the Constitution says. Humala has made a pointless provocation, blurring the inauguration and politically clumsy. Humala has been elected under the 1993 Constitution.
The Constitution of 1979, Article 205 says I do not understand and that maybe, whatever you want to enforce Humala: – “The presidential term is five years. For reelection, must have passed a presidential term “- Question: A presidential term from guest chairs whom?, He did, or does it precede another?
I ask myself the following question as well. Can he swear – the same style of congressmen who swear by his mom, dad, your pets, or that I – and have the same constitutional weight? Or is the oath the president must be precise and accurate? Because if it’s the second way, the oath is worthless.
Ollanta Humala, start your message to the nation, greeting his guests at the inauguration – presidents and delegates from other nations. Then thanks and greetings to his family.
Then – I think modestly – made a series of somewhat demagogic generalizations. José Carlos Mariátegui reminded, in other words said more state is needed to reach the remotest corners of our country. – More bureaucracy? – Invoked the 1979 constitution again highlighting the work of Haya de la Torre – Congressman applauded this gesture Mulder standing.
Humala reaffirmed its commitment to respect press freedom and the rule of law. He then mentioned what the characteristics of his government, that summed up as follows (Note that this information is to file): “Reform, democracy, freedom, inclusion, redistribution, growth, peace with justice, security, decentralization, transparency , sovereignty and consensus. ” Is it true?
Something that we all agree is when he said:
- “We will respect the fiscal rules to address potential external shocks or natural disasters. And – in other words – continue all projects that are underway, also honoring trade agreements with countries and blocs friends “-.
On the living wage said that from August 75 soles rise and in January of next year another 75 soles to 750 soles complete promised, since the current is 600 soles. Humala How to make macro-economic growth, go before this announcement? Also announced 250 new soles 65 pension for the elderly poor (Mind you, not of extreme poverty, but poor) but again will not say where all this money.
No but I have a sneaking suspicion that Luis Miguel Castilla – Minister of Economy – and who looked very attentive when Humala said this, not last long in this position.
Humala also said the following: – “We will take steps, to which Peru has its national airline. And the commercial air market, more open and more competitive, especially to lower and broaden communication within the country “- How is the subsidiary role of the state? Was not that where there is no private investment, the State is present?
Two ad serving pronouncements of President Humala, is to save as file, to see if they really perform. And they literally were: – “In the case of Lima, which has grown from a disorderly and chaotic, we will continue the investment of public transport in the city” – and the second was: – “Notice that within two months will begin a new stage in the reconstruction of southern towns affected by the earthquake of 2007, what will be done with the help of engineering battalions of the Armed Forces “-.
In general, the President’s message Ollanta Humala, was – in my humble opinion – focused and coherent. A message that is worthy of the promises to track to meet as jealous guardians of democracy. And near the end of it, Humala said something that caught my attention and I think, is about to die:
- “The Government intends to recognize and claim, three million migrants … We want to Peruvians who want to return to their homeland, they do, and so encourage them to be eligible for credit … Those who claim rights salaries and say: not lower their flags, but they know that any change to be sustainable, must be gradual and rational “-
Near the end also the president said something that I was clear. He said everything would be presented by the council of ministers, as is correct, before the Congress. Did the minimum wage is or decree must be consulted in Congress? Same with the 65 pension Is decree or bill? … Well, in any case, if anyone has answers to my questions; months are made known.
My friend Dante comments on my article “God does not shine” and says the following:
- “What a good article, my dear brother! Indeed, the mess with passion in the political stuff (things we know are not saints), means that, inevitably, one will get hurt. I have read and I see you’ve calmed down, a friend and now live calm logic follows a stormy night. I think the best thing happened to us and, above all, we maintain our dignity. Because in the unlikely event that (knock on wood), things do not go so well, I repeat, we preserve our dignity intact by not re-elect those who joined us a kleptocracy that stole more than 600.000 million, without a shred of pity for so many people living in extreme poverty, for many human beings who die every year in Puno, with the cold spell that all governments know will arrive on time with his terrible scythe to every change of calendar. With miserable housing and defenses on the floor by malnutrition how could emerge unscathed from this scourge from the cold? Have already discussed much: the same temperatures and in some cases much lower still, support poor farmers in Europe, Scandinavia and all those frigid zones. They do not die just because they have a pretty good nutrition and protect homes. I wish to start slowly solved many of these hardships in our country, but as I said once, that maybe our grandchildren will enjoy a Peru who developed fully and without free iPhone 4S much pain in their depths. As you have said: May God enlighten us!
A hug and greetings to Adriana.
PD .- Ah and then the storm, I trust that you will not want to sell your house to flee the country, but to opt for a better Peru. Otherwise Who would make my fotovideos and possible filming? Good luck, brother! “-
My friend Dante flatters my article and insists that God can not enter in politics. As God is excluded for certain things in the world. He then says that I have calmed down. But unfortunately always, it has been more aggressive in his comments, has been. I try as far as possible, with a cool head to analyze all these political issues and not fall into passions. No insults or resentment.
Dante then my friend tells me the best thing happened to us. I would argue that things are still unclear. To wait the pronouncement of our elected president, on July 28. For me, it’s as if he were still campaigning. It remains to say that is cleared if the idea is Hugo Chavez. Mr. Chavez wants to be the leader of a Latin American “revolutionary” fight the American yoke. Mr. Chavez wants to fight the European community.
All Latin American countries have sovereignty to decide which countries to make trade agreements. No other country can interfere in decisions of state economy. As I say, need to know what attitude to take our virtual president on this issue. If Ollanta Humala is unchecked – in his speech of July 28 – Mr. Hugo Chavez, will be the first to applaud this decision.
On extreme poverty, I have the following interpretation: We humans have an inevitable behavior to be in constant relationship. And in this ontological relationship, instincts, we tend to help each other. Animals have this instinct. We as thinking beings, we assume with more conviction. But is that consciousness in humans, is grown. It is for this reason that in some people, the instinct to help his fellow man, is more noticeable than others.
The European and some Asian cultures have this instinct, educated and developed in a meaningful way. Everyone – almost – absolutely everyone knows that it must help each other. And do not expect help from the state to solve problems of poverty. It is admirable to observe Japanese culture rising from the rubble after a disaster. See everyone, absolutely everyone works together for this purpose.
Unfortunately we Peruvians – not all, fortunately – we used to blame the current government, not to solve the problem of extreme poverty. Echaditos sit-or in the accommodation, criticizing all those who steal the money without helping the needy. But we are not able, to help it needs and is close (neighbor) to us.
My friend Dante uses the term “flee”. I am not persecuted to flee. Except that Mr. Humala wants to prosecute anyone who does not think like him.
Hopefully they will see how to pronounce the July 28 and, as I repeat: “May God enlighten us.”